Sunday, March 8, 2009

Banaba Leaf Hindi Name Diabetes

BRIEF HISTORY OF SOCIOLOGY VIII: MAX WEBER. STATEMENT OF OBEDIENCE AND RATIONALIZATION.

Another contribution of Max Weber in his sociology was analysis of forms of legitimation of power . He believes that the dominated accept a power when they consider legitimate. Throughout history have developed three different reasons for accepting and therefore considered legitimate power. Traditional Domination
. It is based on the belief of the hereditary nature of leadership. This form of power is legitimized by recourse to tradition is characteristic of certain families monarchical dynasties, princes and patriarchs who have held power ever since. Domination
charismatic. It is based on belief in a person, which are qualities exceptional (charisma) to hold power, and unconditional surrender to it. The ability to govern is considered, in this case, personal and not transferable, ie, not inherited. This type of legitimacy is typical of the prophets, religious leaders, the great warriors, warlords, demagogues, and so on.
rational-legal domination. In this case not due to individuals but to the rules, written laws. The power is legitimized by the law respect that emanates from the united will of an entire people.
These three types of domination have been in history, but do not follow a linear process inexorable. Although in the historical process predominates first a charismatic type, traditional then, finally, rational, Weber believes it can happen that the process is continually interrupted by the appearance of charismatic forms.
One problem that has preoccupied Weber throughout his work has been the unstoppable advance of rationality in Western society. For rationalization, Weber understand the process by which all social structures and human relationships are subject to calculation and administration. The economy, administration (represented by the bureaucracy), religion, politics (bureaucracy games), art, science, even erotic relationships are subject to a rationalizing process that has come to turn the society into an "iron cage."
The evolution of Western society can be understood as a gradual disenchantment of the world. In the western world has decreased the power of magic, of fables or myths. With the advance of rationalization, the enchantment of the world has disappeared from our lives. We replaced a world ruled by gods and spirits, a world controlled by market forces. Modern man holds the belief that everything can come to know and explain, but hard to live happy, because their science and culture seem to move without limit and do not offer a response to the present.
The logic of capitalist society imposes on individual actions, hamper creativity and freedom. Weber sees the administrative bureaucracy of modern times one of the most rail rationalization. Given the bureaucratic apparatus are masses of people, mere numbers. The result of this form of domination is an alienated man, a guy lost in the maze of bureaucratic rationality and unable to take over the destiny of his life.


Wildlife Rescue Online Games

BRIEF HISTORY OF SOCIOLOGY VII: MAX WEBER. ANALYSIS OF CAPITALISM.


Preliminary questions about Max Weber:
to . What you know about Max Weber? B.
What mean by capitalism? When does? C.
Max Weber believed that Christianity, in particular, Protestantism led to the birth of capitalism, do you agree? D.
Do you think there is any relationship between church and economy? If you answered yes, put an example. E.
Do you consider the work as an end or a means? Why? F.
On what grounds has obeyed the power throughout history? G.
According to Weber, the state has "legitimate monopoly of violence" What do you think this phrase means?

Max Weber is one of the founders of sociology. Unlike Comte did not believe that sociology should become an empirical science, on the contrary believed that Sociology is a human science that is based more on understanding the explanation. Can not provide universal laws of human behavior, and can confirm that there is progress in societies. Moreover, against Marx and Marxist, Max Weber rejects the search dogmatic economic causes of phenomena.
Max Weber believed that social facts have a regular, but not think you can find a universal law for all phenomena. The important thing is to understand how individuals who are part of a group understand and interpret what they occurs. To understand the social facts is necessary to reconstruct the meaning that actors attribute to the action they perform. Therefore, the method used gives greater importance to the individual: there is a shift from society in general to the individual interest.
For a social action is required to submit two characteristics: 1 ª
It must be done taking into account other. The action has to take account of others, even when carried out alone or unconsciously.
2 nd That the other people to understand. It is necessary that the action has a symbolic value to others. No matter whether accepted or not.
The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit capitalism, Max Weber attempts to reveal the reasons why that has emerged in Western capitalism. When Weber speaks of capitalism refers to a rational organization of labor. This is a rational organization that affects the media as to modes of production.
He finds a significant relationship between the Protestant religion and capitalism. Protestant religion, especially Calvinism believes that God is a transcendent being, whose plans are unknown to man. Human beings exist by the will of God and God assigns to each destination according to criteria completely inscrutable to humans. God gives grace to humans, and they can not know if your work or your thoughts can salvation can not use the confession to be saved.
In the anguish of not knowing whether or not we shall be saved, Calvin proposed two tips to save your soul.
1 º believe was considered a duty chosen and rejected, as the devil's own idea of \u200b\u200bdamnation. This duty leads to self-confidence that is characteristic of the businessman.
2 º For the self-confidence, believing it was recommended to continuing professional work. This work made him an instrument of divine will and choice of His grace. The realization led to incessant labor it will take place in a more methodical, more rational. One's behavior will be subjected to a constant rationalization.
possible enrichment work, which was allowed provided it had not intended the enjoyment of possessions, but to honor the glory of God. Thus, the businessman could not enjoy their wealth but accumulate. The result was the accumulation of wealth that is invested in new productive forces.
arose also a kind of bourgeois businessman convinced of being in a state of grace and self-confident, justified its enrichment and the unequal distribution of assets as a work of divine providence inscrutable.

Sunday, March 1, 2009

ıllegal Kds Pıc

BRIEF HISTORY OF SOCIOLOGY IX: Emile Durkheim social mobility

Arguably
Émile Durkheim aroused the public's interest in sociology. Comte recognized the importance of the founder of sociology and will coincide with him in the desire to apply a scientific approach to sociology. However, do not accept the dogma with which Comte had his law of three states.
His most important works were: Division of Social Work, The Rules of Sociological Method, Suicide and The Elementary Forms of Religious Life .
In the Division of Social Work, examines the relationship between two forms of solidarity: mechanical and organic. Mechanical solidarity is one in which there is a strong integration, imposing the ideas of the group over the individual. This solidarity is characteristic of old or very small communities. They develop a strong collective consciousness and emphasize the similarities between the individuals over their differences.
extends organic solidarity in modern societies. It is based on the differentiation between individuals emerging after the division of labor. In these societies, highlighting differences between people and weaken the collective consciousness. However, there comes to social cohesion disappear because the division of labor causes mutual dependence between people. In these societies, the interaction is necessary, but at the same time, increases the autonomy of each person.
However, in contemporary societies, Durkheim found some forms of discomfort from the division of labor. These include the large size of the selfishness that discussed in his book on suicide. In this work indicates that selfishness is the main cause of the lack of social integration and suicide. In turn, the cause of selfishness and demoralization is the demystification of contemporary societies. That is, the loss of common values \u200b\u200bthat unite societies.
To the demystification of the modern world could imagine two solutions: The first would be a return to traditional sacred principles, hardly changed. The second would be to seek new sacred principles. Durkheim believed that this is possible because something similar has already happened with the French Revolution. They are seeking a secular morality based on three main ideas: a spirit of discipline, a commitment to social groups and autonomy.



Questions to guide a discussion of Durkheim:
What may be the reason why in some societies there is a large number of suicides?
Do you think that selfishness has advantages? What?
The absence of a strong bond between individuals of a modern community causes certain problems, how can they be solved?
Could anything be sacred and not religious? Set an example.
Is there something that is "sacred" for Seville? Why not a single thing?